Home
Articles
Sustainable News
Editor's Note:
Last month, the World Health Organization (WHO) released a study supporting the
safety of genetically modified organisms. The report emphasizes the pre-market
safety assessments conducted on GM foods and recommends the harmonization of
international standards for a cohesive regulatory framework for these products.
Critics argue that the report avoids discussion of studies whose results do not
support this position. Furthermore, the report cites Codex principles and the
Convention on Biodiversity as safeguards against risks to human health and the
environment but ignores the conflict present within these same institutions
around GM foods. Annex 1 of the document lists members of the group of experts
who provided background to the report. It is comprised exclusively of government
regulators and private biotech interests.
http://www.genecampaign.org/council.html
Gen Campaign & Consumer Coordination Council
July 20, 2005
WHO Endorses GM foods in its New Report
The recently released report of the World Health Organization (WHO) titled
“Modern Food Biotechnology, Human Health and Development: An Evidence –Based
Study” makes an unapologetic case for the acceptance of GM foods saying they
can “contribute directly to enhancing human health”. In supporting its position,
the WHO report repeats the standard rhetoric of how GMOs will increase
agricultural productivity, improve nutritional values, raise farm incomes and
increase crop sustainability and food security. The report does not detail how
all this is to be achieved, through which crops or traits, nor does the
dichotomy between these expansive projections and the restricted availability
of GM crops, find any mention. The statements are simply made, without any
elaboration. In the 80 page report, less than 3 pages are devoted to the chapter
on the role of modern biotechnology in achieving food security, where no
detailed plans unfold.
Expressing concern at the blanket endorsement of the highly controversial GM
foods by the UN health body, Dr Suman Sahai of Gene Campaign and Mr Bejon Misra
of the Consumer Coordination Council said it was astonishing that the WHO report
does not take on board the concerns raised by civil society organizations,
scientists and consumers across the world, about the safety of GM foods. Nowhere
in the WHO report is there a discussion on the data obtained from the scientific
studies conducted so far on GM foods which have repeatedly shown serious harm to
the health of rats and other experimental animals that were fed GM foods like
corn and potatoes in feeding trials. The damage reported has been fatal in many
cases and experimental animals have shown serious injury to organs like kidneys,
liver and the blood, together with a collapse of the immune system.
Dr Suman Sahai and Mr Bejon Misra said today that India and other countries must
reject the WHO report and join hands to resist the global orchestration in favor
of GM crops and foods led by the US. Instead, countries should evaluate the
considerable scientific data available on the dangers of GM foods and formulate
their own policies to ensure the well being of their farmers and consumers.
They urged the government of India to stop the import of GM foods and to require
mandatory labeling of all other foods that are being imported, especially from
the US. In addition, the release of GM food crops should be held back in India
until clear safety data, generated independently, have been subjected to a
public risk-benefit analysis. GM crops in the pipeline in India, like cabbage,
cauliflower, brinjal, potato, tomato and rice must be put on hold till there
is a better understanding of the health impacts of GM foods.
Well known studies like those of Dr Arpad Pusztai from the Rowett Institute,
Edinburgh, on the lesions and immune collapse caused by GM potatoes in rats,
the studies conducted at Cornell University on the mortality in Monarch butterflies
fed GM corn pollen, the stomach lesions and mortality seen in rats that were
fed the genetically engineered Flavr Savr tomatoes , the numerous reports of
stomach lesions in rats, false pregnancies in cows, excessive cell growth and
damage to animal immune systems seen in experimental animals during feeding
studies, find no mention in the WHO report. Nor is there any mention of the i
nfamous Denko Showa case, where 37 people died and several thousand were disabled,
when they were fed the genetically engineered food supplement Tryptophan. The
accidental disclosure last month of the Monsanto study showing extensive organ
damage in rats fed with their own Bt corn underscores yet again that there are
very real health threats associated with GM foods but the WHO appears to be
unconcerned with the weight of scientific evidence against GM foods.
The new WHO report is in line with the trend visible in international organizations
that are falling like ninepins in the US led efforts to force acceptance of the
controversial GM technology. First , the CGIAR ( Consultative Group on International
Agricultural Research) system began to promote the focus on GM crops as the
answer to better agricultural productivity and food security. This was followed
by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN, FAO, which in its annual
report of 2004, came out with the position that many of the answers to global
food security were to be found in GM crops, and now the report by the WHO, stating
that GMOs will increase agricultural productivity, improve nutritional values,
raise farm incomes, increase food security and enhance human health!
Gene Campaign and Consumer Coordination Council said today that it is irresponsible
and shameful that the world’s premier health agency has decided to toe the line
of the Agbiotech industry and promote foods that are unsafe. Despite clear
evidence that changes in the nutritional value and the biological and immunological
properties of GM foods like maize, potatoes and tomatoes had indeed taken place,
the WHO has chosen to simply ignore these data, and endorse GM foods.
Dr. Suman Sahai, Mr. Bejon Misra
The WHO report is available at:
http://www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/biotech/biotech_en.pdf
This e-mail service shares information to help more people
discuss crucial policy issues affecting global food security. The service is
managed by Amber McNair of the University of Toronto in partnership with the
Centre for Urban Health Initiatives (CUHI) and Wayne Roberts of the Toronto Food
Policy Council, in partnership with the Community Food Security Coalition, World
Hunger Year, and International Partners for Sustainable Agriculture.
Please help by sending information or names and e-mail addresses of co-workers
who'd like to receive this service, to
foodnews@ca.inter.net
|