[an error occurred while processing this directive] Home pointer.gif - 1kb Articles pointer.gif - 1kb Landscaping and Maintenance

Combining Mulch with Geotextiles for Landscape Weed Control

Suppression or elimination of weed growth is a major component of all landscape maintenance programs. Weeds are undesirable due to aesthetic detraction; competition for light, water, nutrients, and space; provision of insect and disease habitats; and possible allelopathic growth suppression.

Most landscape maintenance programs rely on hand weeding, herbicides, and mulches (alone or in combination) to suppress and control weeds. Black plastic has traditionally been used by many landscapers to enhance the effectiveness of organic and inorganic mulches, but several studies have reported adverse effects on landscape plant growth due to its use.

Within the past few years, a new group of synthetic materials has been introduced for use with mulches for landscape weed control. These geotextiles (also called landscape fabrics or weed barriers) have one major advantage over plastics -- they permit the exchange of water and air between the soil and the atmosphere. Several reports have been published on the weed-suppressing effects of these geotextiles, with mixed results. While most are fairly effective at controlling annual weeds, control of perennial weeds is often poor. The manufacturers recommend applying a 2- to 3-inch layer of mulch atop the geotextiles for aesthetic reasons, and as a result, numerous problems have been observed, particularly when organic mulches (pine bark, pine straw, hardwood bark, etc.) are used.

The major problems that have been observed when geotextiles are topped with mulches are:

A potential new problem was discovered this fall at the end of a two-year screening trial. We at the Hampton Roads Experiment Station had planted each of our fabric plots (with and without mulch covering) with plants common to Virginia landscapes -- red maples, Japanese hollies, and azaleas. As we began to take up the mulch layers and fabrics, we discovered that roots of both the red maples and Japanese hollies had not only surfaced under the fabrics in most of the mulch-covered fabric plots, but that tree and shrub roots were growing into, and often up through and atop, the fabrics.

While root surfacing is not uncommon in landscape mulches and forest-floor leaf litter (due to the moist, yet well-aerated nature of this soil covering), we had not thought about it occurring with the mulch-covered fabrics, where the same moist, well-aerated medium is created. Surfacing also occurred under the black plastic and black plastic/mulch plots (presumably due to low oxygen content in the soil under the black plastic), but roots did not grow into or through the plastic. There was also a considerable increase in vole tunnels under the fabric/mulch coverings.

Where we see a potential problem is in landscapes that are periodically reworked or replanted, where sections of fabric might need to be lifted and/or removed. This could severely damage large portions of landscape plant root systems if this phenomena proves common.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]